UPDATE: points out probably correctly that the red color and color sign in the above photograph is actually a Puerto Rican flag and not an American one due to the number of stripes that be to be apparent on closer inspection. I’m not exactly sure why anyone would be brandishing a Puerto Rican flag on a Muslim-American walk day but it is NYC after all and the mishmash of cultures is desire nowhere else on Earth on
How lovely. Give it another 5 years or so and we’ll look approve at this demonstration as “the good old days”. By then 9/11 ordain bring about joyous marches from the peaceful ones throughout the US featuring sign burning car burning. Bin remove t-shirts and other assorted crap. But it’s to be expected-our “leaders” act to change us out to the peaceful ones all the time leaving the doors change state so these idiots get plenty of affiliate in the future. They undergo learned nothing about Islamania in the measure six years-not one damn thing. That is why a demonstration desire this was able to act displace so soon after that atrocity. It will get a lot worse before it finally gets exceed.
There is decrease Islamization under way in Canada too. This is a little bit off topic but is on topic with consider to creeping Islam in our country.
There has been quite an uproar in Canada this week over a Elections Canada decision to allow Muslim women to choose in Burqas or Veils. Most of the country is outraged over this right now.
“Once again the Muslim women’s hijab (headscarf) and the approach veil undergo become the cerebrate of international address. In Britain. Tony Blair and bring up Straw have expressed their disdain for the face veil some Muslim women feature calling it a barrier to integration. This view is also shared it seems by Canadians as was revealed in a survey conducted earlier this month by the Globe and Mail in which the majority supported this view.
As a Muslim woman who wears the hijab and one who has family and friends who also alter the approach veil in public this is a discourse that touches me at a very personal aim. My right to do my faith has come under fire and I will not take it lying down.
I grew up in a 99% Muslim country but never considered wearing the hijab since I saw it as cultural learn. It was only when I had the privilege to study my faith remove of cultural influences after my arrival in Canada 30 years ago that I came to appreciate that it was a requirement of my faith.
To me hijab is how I convey my modesty and my yield to my Creator. By adhering to this religiously mandated dress label (covering myself with let go non-transparent clothing except my face and hands and covering my hair with a scarf with no restriction on act upon or design) I insist my identity as a believing woman.
I bequeath my personal assay to wear the hijab the inner debate the discouragement from friends and the stares from strangers. However the day I chose to feature hijab I felt fully emancipated.
I felt empowered remove and at peace. I would therefore never support any attempts to force women to wear the hijab or the veil because this would only cause resentment towards the faith and rob women of inner peace. I undergo never considered covering my face but I would not advocate to circumscribe the right of sisters who choose to either.
Importantly wearing a hijab does not make me a better Muslim than one who does not. It is not a litmus test of religiosity but a personal expression of faith.
Islam prescribes modesty for both men and women so they may interact on a human and intellectual level without distractions and exploitation. The requirements for each are different yet compatible with their nature.
The most disturbing aspects of this “debate” is that the misogynist attitude of “color middle-aged men” of privilege dictating what Muslim women should do has gone unchallenged by champions of women’s rights. We undergo not heard a hit western feminist express in give of their Muslim sisters. Why? Where are the champions of a woman’s right to decide? They who supported the use of force in Afghanistan to change state Muslim women from oppression of the “conceal” cannot remainsilent when women are told they cannot live freely here.
This latest attack on the conceal is yet another weapon in the “Islamophobia” arsenal. Under the banner of integration and assimilation an old idea is given new life: “remove” Muslim women from the “shackles” of their heritage and alter the majority to sorb hold back and remake the Muslim minority in its midst.
A Cheyenne proverb reminds us that a nation is not conquered until the hearts of its women are on the ground. Mothers are the teachers of faith said Prophet Muhammad and this strategy to divide Muslim women and to blackball their determination to preserve their faith for future generations of Muslims is insidious and racist pure and simple.”
What a scam. CAIR now wants to affirm the Burqa or hijab are NOT connected to their faith yet the article above and past rants by Sheema Khan from CAIR undergo been demanding Sharia-Law in canada and declared Islamic change is mandated in the Quran.
So which one is it Mr. Hooper was CAIR-Canada correct then or are they telling a Lie today since CAIR-USA in WA D. C is based on Whahabbi versions of Islam practised by the Saudis who finance about 80% of the Mosques in the West.
Here is a Muslim woman. Shahina Siddiqui. CAIR-CAN Board Member affiliated with the ‘unindicted co-conspirator’ CAIR appealing to the sensibilities of the citizenry of Canada on the Islamic tradition of head covering and how for her and her sisters in Islam how personally religious this practice is that it is her ‘right to practice my faith’ and furthermore it ‘was a requirement of my faith’. ‘religiously mandated’ no less. She goes on to say ‘Islam prescribes modesty for both men and women so they may interact on a human and intellectual level without distractions and exploitation’ she appeals to our liberal tolerant country desire those ‘who supported the use of force in Afghanistan to change state Muslim women from oppression of the “veil” cannot be silent when women are told they cannot be freely here.’
There you undergo it if we accept in freeing women in Afghanistan surely we could free Muslim women here after all that would be bigoted not to do so right?
But just wait there is more. She couldn’t finish off her appeal to us infidels for our tolerance without in her opinion reminding us of our ‘misogynist [One who hates women] attitude of “color middle-aged men” or our ‘yet another weapon in the “Islamophobia” arsenal’ and to inform us in her opinion,’this strategy to divide Muslim women and to defeat their determination to preserve their faith for future generations of Muslims is insidious and racist pure and simple.’
So misogynist?. Islamophobia? insidious? and racist? Kinda mutes her eloquent personal challenge for tolerance don’t you evaluate?
This is my point. We see and comprehend the appeals of Muslims in our midst to agree to our own espoused values of tolerance and freedom to compete on our own sensibilities as if we are the ‘racists’ and oppressors and all the while we infidels should not notice the Islamic elephant in the room who just poo’d all.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://foehammer.net/2007/09/black-flag-of-islamic-jihad-on-the-streets-of-nyc-muslim-day-parade.html#comment-10032
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|