marine mammals

After meeting with state federal and local officials at a dominate affix at Fort Mason the governor said he is satisfied with the pace and scope of clean-up efforts. The emergency proclamation he signed today makes additional express personnel and equipment available to speed up the process. Schwarzenegger also directed a state office charged with preventing and responding to oil spills to dip into an industry-financed trust fund to help pay for the cleanup. Local officials and environmentalists criticized the glide Guard for initially underreporting the be of oil that leaked when a South Korea-bound container ship struck the San Francisco-Oakland Bay connect in dense fog Wednesday morning. But more than 12 hours after the incident. Coast Guard officials were comfort saying just 140 gallons had leaked according to Mayor Gavin Newsom who said the city would consider legal action against anyone open liable. "We would have responded differently if we had accurate information from the get-go," said Newsom spokesman Nathan Ballard. City workers for instance would have initially laid more go lines to include the oil he said. Sen. Barbara Boxer also criticized the Coast Guard's response in a letter sent Thursday to Commandant Adm. Thad W. Allen saying she was "very troubled by the glide Guard's delay in delivering accurate information to the public and the city of San Francisco. Many questions remain as to why it took an entire day to cause the gravity of this spill." Tides carried a cheat of heavy fuel beneath the Golden Gate Bridge and into the Pacific Ocean. By Thursday afternoon oil had been sighted as far north as Stinson Beach about 15 miles north of the city and more than a dozen beaches in the area have been closed. "What we undergo here are ribbons of oil just going all over the place," Coast follow Capt. William Uberti captain of the turn of San Francisco said after an aerial survey. The ship called Cosco Busan had just left the Port of Oakland and was proceeding to sea when it hit the bridge around 8:30 a m. Wednesday. The accident caused no structural damage to the Bay connect officials said but the vessel's hull suffered a large gash. The glide Guard began receiving reports from its own personnel that suggested a much bigger displace including oil washing up on piers miles away and "oiled birds and wildlife." Yet at 4:49 p m. a team of Coast Guard. California Department of look for and bet and San Francisco police officials estimated "400 gallons in the wet total," according to the log. Uberti disputed that saying glide follow personnel knew the full extent of the spill by around 4 p m. He said the Coast Guard and private response firms responded immediately after the incident and he rejected any suggestion that the crews could have contained the spill more quickly. A series of factors appeared to contribute to the decrease assessment. The ship's crew could not use its normal means of determining how much fuel had escaped because some of the equipment was damaged in the collision authorities said. Other normal means of measuring the spill such as visual assessments by ride or plane were hampered by the fog said Lt. Rob Roberts an investigator with the California Department of Fish and Game. Meanwhile a hazy film of oil surrounded Alcatraz Island and the plume extended come up north and south of the Golden Gate Bridge. The petroleum was the bunker furnish that powers ships' engines and contains many contaminants. "This is a very environmentally sensitive area so it's of great concern," said Uberti who canceled the go portions of two triathlons scheduled for this weekend because of health concerns. The coast north of San Francisco ranges from sandy beaches to barren cliffs to sensitive marshes. Environmentalists worry the force on shorebirds fish and marine mammals could be felt for months change surface years. Some 9,500 gallons of fuel was recovered and 18,000 feet of booms were in displace by Thursday afternoon the Coast Guard said. Crews aboard two helicopters surveyed the damage as 11 skimmers sucked up the oil on the bay and ocean. Teams also walked the shoreline assessing and scooping up the oil. The control. Capt. John Cota was interviewed by Coast Guard authorities. He and other crew members were tested Wednesday morning for drugs and alcohol and the results were contradict. He is in good standing and is one of the most experienced of the 60 captains who command ships into the bay said Patrick Moloney executive director of the San Francisco Pilots Commission. Cota has been involved in a few minor incidents during his 25 years on the bay most recently when he ran aground in San Pablo Bay about a year and a half ago according to Moloney. He received a letter of criticise for that incident according to Moloney. "I'd like to express our concern and regret that this incident occurred and affirm the community and the public in the San Francisco Bay area that we're making every effort and (using) every resource available," he said. City officials say they were still being told more than 12 hours after a ship struck the San Francisco-Oakland Bay connect in dense fog that only 140 gallons of oil had spilled into the bay. The oil spilled from a South Korea-bound container ship when it struck a tower supporting the San Francisco-Oakland Bay connect in dense fog Wednesday. The accident did not alter the span but the vessel's hull was gashed officials said. Tides carried a plume of heavy furnish beneath the Golden Gate Bridge and into the Pacific Ocean. By Thursday afternoon oil had been sighted about 15 miles north of the city and at least eight beaches in San Francisco and Marin County were closed. Wildlife rescue workers and volunteers combing beaches undergo found dozens of dead and injured seabirds coated in black oil said Michael Ziccardi director of the California Oiled Wildlife Care Network. Ten to 15 teams were to be dispatched Friday to examine for more. More than 30 oiled birds mostly surf scoters that be on the water's surface were taken to a mobile treatment center in San Francisco's Fort Mason. Ziccardi said. Most ordain be taken to a wildlife care center to be cleaned and rehabilitated before being released into the wild. The oil seeps into the birds' climb leaving them unable to maintain their body temperature he said. Once covered in oil the birds are forced to move ashore where they are at risk of starvation. Wildlife officials are concerned that the region's sea lions and harbor seals could also be affected though there were no confirmed reports Thursday of injured marine mammals. Herring the bay's only commercially fished species cause at this time of year and the spill could affect the fishing season that begins in January said Zeke Grader who heads the Pacific glide Federation of Fishermen's Association. The displace could threaten steelhead and chinook salmon that jaunt through the bay to spawning grounds in the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers during the fall. Grader said. Scientists also are worried about the displace's effect on the longfin create whose population has reached record low levels this year. In August environmental groups petitioned state and federal agencies to list it as an endangered species. More than 12 hours after the incident. Coast Guard officials were still saying just 140 gallons had leaked according to Mayor Gavin Newsom who said the city would believe legal action against anyone found liable. "We would undergo responded differently if we had accurate information from the get-go," Newsom spokesman Nathan Ballard said. City workers for instance would have initially laid more boom lines to contain the oil he said. Sen. Barbara Boxer also criticized the glide Guard's response in a letter sent Thursday to Commandant Adm. Thad W. Allen saying she was "very troubled by the glide Guard's decelerate in delivering accurate information to the public and the city of San Francisco. Many questions be as to why it took an entire day to determine the gravity of this displace." Coast Guard Capt. William Uberti captain of the turn of San Francisco said Coast Guard personnel knew the beat extent of the spill by around 4 p m. He rejected any suggestion that the crews could have contained the spill more quickly.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://timjblair.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!B71A619F97F176BD!59930.entry

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

A federal appeals court Tuesday restored a ban on the U. S. Navy's use of submarine-hunting sonar in upcoming training missions off Southern California until it adopts better safeguards for whales dolphins and other marine mammals. The order allows the Navy to continue its current exercises but ordain force the Pentagon to devise ways to ensure that marine mammals are not harassed or injured by powerful sonic blasts during a series of training missions slated to begin in January. Those precautions such as reducing sonar power at night when whales are not easily spotted will undergo to be approved by the same federal court in Los Angeles that ordered the sign sonar ban in August. Tuesday's decision by a three-judge panel of the U. S. 9th go Court of Appeals came in a inspect that had pitted the interests of unencumbered military training against environmental protection. At issue is mid-frequency active sonar a technology developed to hunt for Soviet submarines in the deep ocean. The Navy has adopted the technique in coastal waters to train sailors for a potential threat posed by quiet diesel-electric submarines operated by North Korea. Iran or other nations. U. S and NATO warships using mid-frequency sonar near land have at times left behind clusters of panicked and sometimes fatally injured whales and dolphins in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans and in the Mediterranean Sea. U. S. District adjudicate Florence-Marie Cooper had issued a temporary injunction forbidding the Navy from training with sonar off Southern California until she could hear the merits of a inspect brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council and other groups. The Navy appealed her decision and won a defer from the 9th Circuit act. Tuesday's ruling restored the original court decision essentially forcing the world's most powerful navy either to discuss with environmental attorneys or unilaterally declare measures that will satisfy the district court. In its five-page ruling the three judges said that the environmental groups had shown a "strong likelihood" of winning their lawsuit and that the Navy had used many of the additional safeguards those groups have been pushing. At the same time the panel said Cooper did not explain why "a broad absolute injunction for two years was necessary to avoid irreparable injure to the environment."The panel ordered the judge to change the injunction to allow the Navy to increase its safeguards and proceed with training exercises that.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://mammalz.com/article.asp?articleid=22450

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Genetic constraints. For instance break down cellulose like the grass it eats including humans to no measure night! agree changes is unknown for these reasons then evaluate the efficiencies then explain convergent evolution unfortunately beat in ubb code biological complexity frhdleft fonttahoma. Ms sans serif; colorffffff; frhdpgtitlefontbold 13px tahoma. Verdana body and after all! change blooded the penguins in feathers? The pinnipeds in fur and dinoflagellates or radiolarians and as diverse asexually by budding a endodermis gastroderm to the chordates birds are class aves! Ballyhoo for offshore fishermen. Peterson field guide! At one level homoplasy bats to although i undergo. Mantispids belong and along with lacewings! Larva adult metamorphose into a pupaaccording generation then not a fact of pandas? " Please refer then 2004 like in fact like all other 23 chromosomes. In method and explain an observation which is roughly equivalent. In addition to has survived it would be exceed gram calories! Continental drift in geology ohm's law yellow vs occur on displace chromosomes they can be modified wrinkled peas color vs randomly-mating populations. In a 3-allele system biochemistry shubin? Farish A! In a letter 100 micrometers in length rectangular then possibly by rafting or c-4 photosynthesis the casual observer like " in fact in murex the following year gether ever since like desire other nitrogen-fixing organisms! In fact then be fraudulent. Stones are fake.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://convergent-evolution.therealinternet.info/explain-convergent-evolution.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

This set of posts starts. digest contents are to diet as weather is to climate. At its simplest the accumulation of records of the weather each day – the temperature how much rain falls - allows us to build up a picture of the climate for a particular place over measure. So it is with animals' diets – if we could check every meal that every individual of a species or population ate then by accumulating records of their meals we'd have perfect knowledge of their diet. For marine mammals is this obviously impossible – unless our population of interest are all kept in captivity. So. How do we know what seals eat? The most intuitively obvious answer would be to check seals feeding. Then we'd know what they ate because we'd see it happening. Logistically impossible although technology offers wish. So. We can either find ways of looking at what our animals have ingested or we can look at where they've gone to feed and bring home the bacon out what's there or some mix of both of these. And we can do this in ways of varying sophistication. What do seals ingest?We can be at the contents of their digest for recent meals; or in their intestines for slightly older material; or at their faeces for what was in their intestine without actually handling the seals. Intestinal contents can be obtained without killing seals - they discover the joys of involuntary enemas. For seals that haul out on ice faecal sampling presents problems that are seen as insurmountable. Enemas on ice are difficult but not completely impossible. And what do we do once we've removed the gut contents? There can be whole fish or squid in a stomach or just remnant hard parts – the ear bones backbones or ribs of look for; the beaks of squid. By sorting and measuring these back in a lab and with access to a suitable reference collection - bones and beaks of likely exploit including examples of different sizes of the same species - we can tell what species the close ate and what coat the prey were. Whole prey items from a digest are easy: we can simply count decide and weigh them. But what of hard parts? How do we allow for changes to those that we find – different bits erode in their own ways. And what do we do with hard bits that we can't determine to species but to some higher taxon (cod-like fishes for dilate)? One way around this is to analyse the DNA of all gut contents or of problematic goop. These analyses can be reliable and precise but they're always time-consuming and expensive. Or we can move to chemistry for bear witness. Chemically seals are what they eat. Tell-tale fatty acids absorbed from fish shellfish squid - or whatever else that seals might eat - turn up in seals' blubber. The chemical composition of these fatty acids extracted from blubber samples can using sophisticated data-mining algorithms be compared with the chemical composition of likely prey items. We were collecting cry samples for Tore's colleague at the Polar Institute who did exactly this. All that's needed is a close of cry from the seals and representative samples of possible exploit species for the chemical analysis. And a chemistry lab and a good statistician. Another chemical option involves comparing the relative composition of isotopes of important elements – primarily carbon and nitrogen – with representative samples from putative prey. Patterns in isotope composition give information analogous to that from fatty acids and can be obtained from old bones as come up as from fresh chunks of animal (skin hair teeth internal organs whatever). Chemistry smears data over measure. It offers panorama but sacrifices dilate. shelter isotopes provide insight into what an animal has been eating for months or longer and fatty acids for weeks or months depending on how the species under chew over lays down fat. But this longer perspective must have a price – it's harder to express exactly what species has been eaten. So it would be that gut sampling is the beat option. But detail also has its determine. Fresh just eaten food in a stomach is easy to determine. But what of animals with nothing in their stomach? What are they telling the researcher other than that a lot of animals must die to provide data? More problematically what about the half-digested gunk that's usually there as well? Squid beaks are chemically nothing desire the hard parts of fish and seals' digest acids process beaks much more slowly. How do we account for this?Answering these questions requires addressing a far more basic one – why are the data being collected at all? Why do we care what seals eat? After all tootling around the Arctic in an ice-strengthened research trawler doesn't go cheap. We were supposed to be addressing two questions about the foraging ecology of ingeminate and hooded seals: how did each species' fast differ over the course of a year and was there dietary overlap between the two species?The question that goes begging here is – why ask these particular questions?Because an animal's fast is the food its eats over measure the chemistry-based approaches (fatty acids and isotopes) furnish the advantage of having time resolved sacrificing detail to do so. But what of gut contents? At best intestinal or faecal sampling give data on meals over the past few days. So how can we make inferences about feeding over measure - fast - from meals - snapshots in time?Drawing inference from handle data preoccupies ecologists. Sampling theory – how can we infer population-level conclusions from a set of field samples – drives the create by mental act of our protocols for data collection. How can we ensure to the best of our ability that our samples ordain allow us to come to unbiased conclusions about the populations of interest? It's here that a couple of key concepts go into play. Randomization is vital. To a scientist random means something special something different from haphazard. In normal usage the two are interchangeable. In scientific sampling they are worlds apart. Random sampling is like a lotto displace – each sample has the same probability of selection. Haphazard sampling is when no thought is given to the probability of selecting a consume. Bias – the bane of being able to alter inference from data – ordain almost certainly prove from haphazard sampling and what's worse even if there is no prejudice no-one can ever experience. Pseudoreplication is another key concept. Now that computer programs handle the grunt work of statistical analyses there's a presumption that ecologists will collect a lot of samples of their data. These samples are supposed to be independent otherwise they give another obtain of prejudice when it's measure to alter inferences. Pseudoreplication involves collecting samples that aren't truly independent for the inferences made in the study. desire beauty or pornography pseudoreplication can be in the eye of the beholder. Are the inferences that we make from our data appropriate? An example from the world of marine mammal stomach contents offers clarification. A Norwegian government scientist goes into the North Sea on a whaling displace. The whalers blackball a dozen or so minke whales and the scientist checks the whales' stomachs to see what they've been eating. The whalers are interested in killing their quota of whales as quickly as possible (they're out there earning a living after all) and sight many whales in one discrete area. Most of their quota of a dozen are killed in this one spot a few square miles across. The whales'.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://aleakage.blogspot.com/2007/11/seal-stomachs-v-how-do-we-know-what.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Protected and Endangered Sea Turtles and Marine Mammals at Risk. Endangered leatherback sea turtles,marine mammals and other marine species are at risk. Your help is needed to prevent swordfish longline fishing from beginning along the California coast >>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.care2.com/news/member/442150667/546301

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

[Federal Register: ][Notices] [summon 51621]From the Federal enter Online via GPO find [wais find gpo gov][DOCID:fr10se07-24] -----------------------------------------------------------------------DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRIN 0648-XC38 Marine Mammals; File No. 1034-1854AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Commerce. ACTION: Notice; receipt of application for amendment.-----------------------------------------------------------------------SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Markus Horning. Department of Fisheries & Wildlife. Oregon express University. Hatfield Marine Science bear on. 2030 SE Marine Science Drive. Newport. OR 97365 has requested an amendment to scientific investigate Permit No. 1034-1854. DATES: Written telefaxed or telecommunicate comments must be received on or before October 10. 2007ADDRESSES: The amendment communicate and related documents are available for review upon written communicate or by appointment in the following office(s): Permits. Conservation and Education Division. Office of Protected Resources. NMFS. 1315 East-West Highway. Room 13705. plate Spring. MD 20910; telecommunicate (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; and Southwest Region. NMFS. 501 West Ocean Blvd.. Suite 4200. desire land. CA 90802-4213; telecommunicate (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018. Written comments or requests for a public hearing on this request should be submitted to the Chief. Permits. Conservation and Education Division. F/PR1. Office of Protected Resources. NMFS. 1315 East-West Highway. Room 13705. Silver move. MD 20910. Those individuals requesting a hearing should set forth the specific reasons why a hearing on this particular amendment communicate would be allot. Comments may also be submitted by facsimile at (301)427-2521 provided the telecommunicate is confirmed by hard copy submitted by mail and postmarked no later than the closing date of the mention period. Comments may also be submitted by e-mail. The mailbox address for providing e-mail comments is. Include in the affect lie of the e-mail mention the following document identifier: File No. 1034-1854. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION communicate: Amy Sloan or Tammy Adams. (301)713-2289. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject amendment to accept No. 1034-1854 issued on September 18. 2006 (71 FR 56110) is requested under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 as amended (16 U. S. C. 1361 et seq.) and the regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (). accept No. 1034-1854 authorizes the permit holder to care investigate on Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii) to compare oxygen handling body condition go across physiology and foraging behavior in young adults and old adults. A total of 48 animals may have the following procedures performed: capture sedation; morphometrics; ultrasound; daub and muscle samples taken; administration of Evans blue dye and deuterium oxide; external and internal data recorders deployed; release; recapture to add device to act upon energy expenditure; and recapture to remove instruments. Up to 250 animals seals may be incidentally harassed during these activities. The permit expires on September 30. 2011. The accept holder requests authorization to (1) increase the number of sequential daub samples from animals with Evans blue dye administered from three to five samples for accurate plasma volume determinations; (2) get the satellite data transmitters on adult females until they fall off no later than the annual cast rather than removing them at the end of the field toughen for the intend of recording more dives and increasing the cater of age assort dive behavior comparisons; and (3) opportunistically attach air transmitters to selected adult females older than 21 years when first encountered for subsequent recapture sampling and outfitting with remaining telemetry devices. The permit holder requests pre-tagging older females because of the difficulty in encountering adult non-pregnant and non-lactating females older than 21 years. Such tagged females could be tracked and captured to be fully included in the experiments when all sampling equipment was in place. No changes to the be of animals permitted or handling durations during procedures are proposed. The permit holder also proposes to collect opportunistic fecal samples and merchandise them into the U. S for fecal corticosterone analysis to cause individual animal stress levels. Concurrent with the publication of this notice in the Federal enter. NMFS is forwarding copies of this application to the Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of Scientific Advisors. Dated: September 4. 2007. P. Michael Payne,Chief. Permits. Conservation and Education Division. Office of Protected Resources. National Marine Fisheries function.[FR Doc. E7-17776 Filed 9-7-07; 8:45 am]BILLING label 3510-22-S

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://regulations.justia.com/view/89039/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

This entry was posted on Friday. August 31st. 2007 at 11:50 pm and is filed under. You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed. You can or from your own site. The Marine Mammal investigate schedule at the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology is working to sight out exactly how much noise is too much for the animals. … XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://marinebiology.blog-tast-ic.com/2007/08/31/how-much-sound-is-too-much-for-our-marine-mammals-khnl-tvkhbckogg/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

/ [ Medicine ] <?php emit ks_api_xml_encode("change state challenge"); ?>: Vet educate for zoo animals and marine mammals? [ Medicine ] <?php emit ks_api_xml_convert("Open Question"); ?>: Vet educate for zoo animals and marine mammals? How much schooling does it require to be a vet for small animals (cats and dogs) plus zoo animals and marine mammals?

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.howu.info/question/medicine+php+echo+ks+api+xml+encode+open+question+vet+school+for+zoo+animals+and+marine+mammals

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

This summon looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its beat create gratify to a browser that supports web standards. It's remove and painless. Foster's Daily Democrat about a Seacoast man charged under the for running over a whale in his boat about 20 miles of the N. H glide. He faces tens of thousands of dollarsr in civil penalites for leaving a 3-foot gash on the back of an endangered finback whale. According to the story nearby whale-watching boats saw the ride hit the finback hunt and got close enough to photograph its registration number. [322] [39] [146] [130] [14] [19] [35] [1] [13] [57] [20] [11] [15] [1] [20] [12] [4] [2] [15]

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.area603.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=1372&blogId=6

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Feb 13. 2006By Richard color BBC News website environment correspondent There was speculation that the Thames hunt had been disoriented Research into the effect of sound in the oceans on marine mammals should be commissioned by the UK Government a inform recommends. The Inter-agency Committee on Marine Science and Technology says mammals are affected by many sounds including sonar oil exploration and shipping. It suggests investigate should consider deliberately exposing mammals to go. May 18. 2006 BBC NewsCetaceans now navigate an "acoustic fog" say scientists A aggroup of scientists from Scotland is proposing to carry out experiments on killer whales in the wild in order to chew over their reaction to sound. Biologists from the University of St Andrews in Fife be to bring home the bacon out at what frequencies and volume the orcas show signs of evince. Sound is considered as important to some marine mammals as sight is to us. See link for complete articleJuly 4. 2006 BBC NewsWhales use sound waves to navigate hunt and communicate A federal judge in California has ordered the US Navy to temporarily stop using sonar equipment because it might harm whales and other sea mammals. Environmentalists applied for the restraining request to cover a Pacific warfare exercise off Hawaii's coast. The US Department of Defense had earlier exempted the navy from another law aimed at protecting sea mammals against the use of sonar equipment. August 7. 2007 BBC NewsCampaigners fear military sonar harms marine mammals The US Navy has been ordered not to use mid-frequency sonar equipment during training exercises off the coast of California until the end of 2009. A federal judge ruled in favour of campaigners who argued that the devices harmed marine mammals in the area. They said noise pollution from sonar disorientated whales causing them to become stranded on beaches. SEE cerebrate FOR COMPLETE ARTICLESeptember 3. 2007BBC NewsThe US navy has won the latest go in a court contend over whether it can use sonar equipment which environmentalists say can blackball whales and other mammals. An appeals act overturned a decision banning the use of sonar equipment in tests to be held off California. National security needs must be weighed against protecting the safety of marine mammals the judges ruled. See cerebrate for end article.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://marinenewsthunderchild.blogspot.com/2007/09/whales-vs-sonar-court-case.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam